benchmarkingblog

Elisabeth Stahl on Benchmarking and IT Optimization

No Exalytics Benchmarks, Oracle All By Myself

with 2 comments

I understand that Sting and Tom Petty will be performing at OpenWorld this week, along with a very large ferris wheel. But the guy I am really looking for is Eric Carmen, born in that great city of Cleveland, Ohio, to sing about the latest benchmark results from Oracle.

Today, Oracle published four SAP SD Parallel 2-tier benchmark results in order to highlight the 80-core Sun Fire X4800 M2, based on the Xeon E7-8870 processor. Most notably for these results is what they are not.

  • They are NOT results on the SPARC T4, the SPARC Supercluster, or anything SPARC.
  • They are also NOT on the Exadata, the Exalogic, or new Database Appliance (based on Xeon X5675).
  • They are NOT even on the new Exalytics (which happens to be based on the E7-4800 with 40 cores plus extra memory, storage and network interfaces.)
  • And they are most certainly NOT based on the SAP SD benchmark, where there are many results from multiple vendors to compare; they were published on the SAP SD-Parallel benchmark, which uses a different data distribution entirely. Oracle is the ONLY ONE to have published on this latest version of this benchmark. The last result from absolutely anyone else on the entire benchmark is from 2008.
  • “When I was young, I never needed anyone . . . those days are gone.”

    ************************************************

    Source: http://www.sap.com/benchmark. Results current as of 10/3/11.

    SAP, mySAP and other SAP product and service names mentioned herein as well as their respective
    logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germany and in several other countries all
    over the world.

    The postings on this site solely reflect the personal views of the author and do not necessarily represent the views, positions, strategies or opinions of IBM or IBM management.

    technorati tags: , , , , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

    Advertisements

    Written by benchmarkingblog

    October 3, 2011 at 10:49 am

    Posted in Exalytics, SD-Parallel

    Tagged with , , , , ,

    2 Responses

    Subscribe to comments with RSS.

    1. >They are NOT even on the new Exalytics (which happens to be based on the E7-4800 with 40 cores plus extra memory, storage and network interfaces.)

      …actually Exalytics is just a stock x4470M2 …there is no “extra memory”…all 64 DIMMS are populated with 16GB DIMMS…. are you kidding? Sun has nothing like the MAX5..now *that’s* “extra memory” 🙂

      kevinclosson

      November 10, 2011 at 11:48 am

    2. I can’t wait to see Oracle Exalogic SPECjAppServer2010 results. Oracle says so much about the amazing performance of that machine, but no benchmark results. Why would that be? Why publish WebLogic results on DELL, CISCO, etc., but not on their own hardware?

      Roman Kharkovski

      November 11, 2011 at 2:41 pm


    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s

    %d bloggers like this: